Photo by Willians Huerta on Pexels

For a few years, PrizePicks and Underdog pulled off a neat trick. They let people bet on player stats, over or under, stack a few together for a big payout, and called it daily fantasy sports instead of sports betting. Regulators have finally stopped buying it. Across state after state in 2026, gaming authorities looked at the pick’em product, decided it was a parlay wearing a fantasy costume, and started sending cease-and-desist letters. The companies that built a huge business on a legal grey area are now watching that grey area close, one state at a time, and scrambling to rebuild the product before it gets banned out from under them.

What Pick’em Actually Is

Strip the branding and it’s obvious. You pick a player. You bet him over or under a number, passing yards, points, rebounds, whatever. Then you bolt on another pick, and another, and the more legs you stack the fatter the payout if they all land. Sound like anything? It’s a same-game parlay wearing a nametag that says fantasy. Real daily fantasy meant drafting a full roster and grinding against other players. This version quietly deleted all of that and left the one move that’s pure sportsbook: an over-under on a single athlete. The word fantasy was doing an absurd amount of legal heavy lifting.

The States Piling On

The regulatory dam broke in 2026, and it broke everywhere at once. A long line of states have now moved against the traditional pick’em model with cease-and-desist orders or formal rulings:

• New York, Michigan and Florida among the states ordering the pick’em model to stop
• Maryland, Massachusetts and Ohio adding their own cease-and-desist actions
• Connecticut, Iowa and Tennessee rounding out a rapidly growing list
• Florida’s Gaming Control Commission naming Underdog, PrizePicks and Betr directly
• The common finding: it looks like illegal sports betting, not a fantasy contest

The Legal Argument, and Why the Operators Lost It

The whole defense rested on one word: skill. Daily fantasy got its legal foothold years ago by arguing it was a contest of skill, not gambling, and therefore exempt from betting law. Pick’em stretched that argument past breaking. Florida’s regulator put it bluntly, saying state law prohibits betting on the outcome of skill contests, sports betting and fantasy betting included, and that these operators may simply be taking illegal wagers from residents. Once a regulator decides your product is a bet, the skill-contest shield stops working, because the law it was hiding behind was never meant to cover a two-leg over-under on an athlete’s stat line. The costume finally slipped.

It Was Always a Parlay

Here’s the uncomfortable core of it. The reason pick’em got so popular is the exact reason it’s now illegal in so many places: it’s a parlay, and parlays are the most lucrative, most habit-forming product in betting. Stack legs, chase a fat multiplier, lose most of the time. That’s the same margin engine we broke down in the parlay economy, just offered by a company that didn’t hold a sportsbook license and didn’t pay sports-betting tax. Of course the licensed operators complained, and of course the regulators eventually agreed, because from the player’s chair there was never a meaningful difference between a PrizePicks entry and a same-game parlay on FanDuel.

The Pivot to Peer-to-Peer

The companies aren’t dying. They’re mutating. In the states that banned the classic product, PrizePicks and Underdog came back as peer-to-peer contests, players against each other instead of against the house, which slides them back under the fantasy umbrella that’s still legal. It works, sort of. It also costs the customer. Lower multipliers, thinner edges, and none of the smooth house-banked feel that made these apps blow up in the first place. The operators keep a foothold. The players get a worse deal. That’s how a grey-area product usually ages once the regulators show up.

Where It Goes From Here

The pick’em fight is really a preview of a bigger one. As betting products keep multiplying and blurring, prediction markets, pick’em, microbetting, the line between what’s a regulated sportsbook wager and what’s something-else-that-walks-like-one is going to get litigated over and over. Pick’em is just the first of these hybrids to get caught. Expect the survivors to keep hunting for the next legal seam, and expect regulators, now alert to the trick, to close it faster. The lesson operators should take is the one they never do: if your product is a bet, a regulator will eventually call it a bet, no matter what you named it. Casino Vertex will keep tracking the rulings state by state.